For me, the ethical complications of
implanting a computer chip on a child are harder to hash out than any
privacy issues. If there are no health risks, would you even have to
tell your child they had a chip implanted on them? The question then
becomes when do you think a child would expect to be able venture into the
world with any semblance of privacy? Using a conservative approach, a
child, technically, should be unable to travel far form the nest,
without the aid of an adult, until they turn 16 and can get their own
license, certainly then, a six year old is not entitled to much
privacy. The real dilemma comes in how the computer chip is able to
be monitored. If the system is allowed for parents to track their child
exclusively, without having to go online or call someone, than I
would fully support it. But, full support becomes harder if the
system is a massive online database with unknown individuals being
able to monitor locations. It does not matter how secure the database
is, nor how miniscule the odds are of you being affected, all it
takes is the theory of one. As we have seen glimpses of already this
semester, all it would take is one person to hack that database to
throw everything into chaos. Likewise, it would not matter if the
system had been able to monitor thousands of children and save
hundreds of kidnapped victims, if it was concluded that a single
child had been abducted by a predator being able to track the victim
through the database, the entire company would collapse under from
the scandal.
Therefore, in a perfect world, I would
support a bill in Congress to require ID chips in children under the
age of 5 and with that support a parents right to have a chip
implanted on their child, barring, of course, any health risks. If
the child’s' location can be securely maintained, the positives far
outweigh the negatives. The same is true with GPS Shoes for seniors
with Alzheimer’s, even better it's less intrusive, only being
tracked by their shoes. If there is the threat, better yet, risk that
a person may lose track of their location, having the ability to find
them can only be a positive.
I agree with you that any parent has the right to choose what to do for their kid. However, I think the I.D. chip is a little extreme, the idea of a computer chip in a human is weird to me. But, I don't think tracking is all bad I think that the GPS shoes are a good option, and a parent can do what they want in the end.
ReplyDelete